LLM comparison: price vs. intelligence
One table to compare large language models across every maker — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, Xiaomi and more. Each model's Intelligence Index sits right next to its real per-token price from OpenRouter, plus the providers that actually serve it. Filter, sort, and find a model that's smart enough and priced right for the job — then wire it into hotdoc with a single API call. First time here? See how to read the table below.
intelligence & speed: artificialanalysis.ai · prices: openrouter.ai
Loading model data…
How to read the table and choose a model
What the columns mean
- Intel — Intelligence Index — Artificial Analysis’s aggregate score: higher means a smarter model on average.
- Mode — Reasoning / non-reasoning and the effort level. Different modes of one model are separate rows with their own score.
- Rsn? — A quick flag: is this a reasoning model (✓) or not. It mirrors the Mode column, but it’s handy for sorting and filtering by type.
- Providers — How many platforms on OpenRouter serve the model. Click the number to see each provider’s price, latency, uptime and quantization.
- in $/M and out $/M — Price per million input and output tokens (from OpenRouter).
- $/intel — Input price divided by the Intelligence Index: the lower it is, the cheaper a unit of intelligence.
- TTFT (s) and t/s — Speed: time to first token, and output tokens per second.
- Context (k) — Context-window size in thousands of tokens.
- Tokenizer — The model’s tokenizer family; it affects the real cost of non-English text (see below).
- Maker — The company that built the model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google…) — not the inference provider.
What the Intelligence Index is
The Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis rolls several benchmarks into one number, so you can compare models on a single scale instead of juggling ten leaderboards. Treat it as a solid average, not gospel: a model that trails by a point or two may still win on your specific task. Use it to shortlist, then test the finalists on your own prompts.
Why $/intel can mislead for reasoning models
Reasoning modes score higher at the same per-token price, so their $/intel looks better. But reasoning is far more verbose — it burns a lot more output tokens — so the real cost of an answer is higher than the column suggests. Read $/intel together with the mode and the output price, not on its own.
Tokenizers and non-English text: what’s cheaper
OpenRouter prices are per token, so the real cost of, say, Russian or Arabic depends on how finely a tokenizer splits the script. Rough order, cheapest to priciest: Gemini/Gemma and GPT (o200k) → Llama 3, Mistral, Command, Claude → Chinese models (Qwen, DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, MiniMax), which chop non-Latin text into more tokens. It’s a qualitative guide, not exact multipliers — only a measurement on your own text gives the real number.
Maker vs. provider — don’t mix them up
Two different things share this table. The maker is who built the model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Xiaomi). A provider is a platform that serves that model over OpenRouter, each with its own price, latency and uptime. One model can have a dozen providers — click the number in the Providers column to compare them side by side.
How to pick in practice
Start from the task, not the hype. Set a minimum Intelligence Index you’re comfortable with, sort by $/intel, and scan the top rows. Need long documents? Filter by context. Watching latency? Sort by TTFT. Working in a non-English language? Lean toward a friendlier tokenizer. Then pass the model you chose to hotdoc and run it against real files.
Frequently asked questions
Ready to put a model to work?
Pick one above, then send your first request. The quickstart has a working example, or grab a free API key and test it on your own files.